· 6 min read

What 380 turfgrass researchers are working on in 2025


This is the second annual analysis of research abstracts presented at the ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting. I used clustering models to group 199 abstracts into turfgrass research topics. Here’s what turf scientists are focused on this year.

Topic clusters visualization showing research themes from turfgrass science abstracts

On desktop, hover over points to see abstract titles. Click topics in the legend to toggle them on and off and explore their distribution in the embedding space.

Top turfgrass research areas in 2025

These are the top problems the industry is trying to solve, and this is where resources are flowing. The top 5 research topics in 2025 are:

1. Soil amendments and soil testing · 9% of abstracts

Compost and organic amendments, carbon sequestration and soil health, soil test interpretation, soil sampling protocols

2. Remote sensing of soil moisture · 8% of abstracts

Machine learning for soil moisture mapping, UAV imaging, hyperspectral and thermal imagery, ground-penetrating radar, L-band radiometry

3. Disease management and fungicides · 8% of abstracts

Dollar spot, large patch, spring dead spot, IPM, fungicide efficacy, nitrogen and PGR impact

4. Putting green maintenance · 7% of abstracts

USGA spec greens, sand topdressing, organic matter management, nitrogen and rolling, surface firmness

5. Precision weed detection · 7% of abstracts

Computer vision for weed detection, UAV-based weed detection, vegetation indices, site-specific herbicide application, machine-vision sprayers

About the conference

The ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting (now going as CANVAS) is the largest academic conference for turfgrass science in North America. The turfgrass division (C-5) is part of the Crop Science Society of America (CSSA), and all abstracts are available in the conference program.

I got 250 C-5 papers using the conference API. After removing blank entries, the dataset contained 199 abstracts from 384 authors.

Like last year, I used SPECTER embeddings that were developed for scientific papers. Then BERTopic clustered similar abstracts together.

Full topic table

This year’s analysis identified 18 distinct clusters. The table below shows the topics, count of abstracts, proportion of total, top words that represent each topic, and the topic name. The first row, topic -1, is outlier abstracts that don’t fit well into other topics. The outlier results are useful information in that they’re truly unique papers.

TopicCountProportionRepresentationTopic name
-1110.06cleat, cores, nir, cleat cleat, sterility, ppn, mg, samples, clay, zjacos24Outliers
1180.09compost, qst713, amendments, soil, applied, soil test, fertilizer, turfgrass, nutrients, galeatusSoil amendments and soil testing
2160.08moisture, ground, soil moisture, irrigation, machine learning, gpr, vwc, stadium, soil, machineRemote sensing of soil moisture
3150.08disease, dollar, dollar spot, spot, fungicides, severity, large patch, fungicide, patch, disease severityDisease management and fungicides
4140.07sand, brd, putting, topdressing, greens, firmness, sand topdressing, putting greens, biochar, layerPutting green maintenance
5130.07weed, weed detection, detection, turfgrass, imagery, uav, vision, precision, indices, imagesPrecision weed detection
6120.06genomic, genome, genetic, qtl, haplotype, ploidy, markers, breeding, lf, diversityTurfgrass genomics and breeding
7110.06germination, kb, seed, tf, dormancy, planting, establishment, kbg, gibberellin, seedingSeed germination and establishment
8110.06professional, turfgrass science, certification, mentorship, mentoring, agencies, teachers, public, turfgrass, professionalsEducation and professional development
990.05mowing, fraise, fraise mowing, mowing requirements, clover, requirements, entries, microclover, seed, speciesMowing and species selection
1090.05rww, nutrient, gypsum, bicarbonate, fertilizer, irrigation, florida, bpcu, recycled wastewater, blackoutRecycled wastewater irrigation
1190.05goosegrass, methiozolin, control, topramezone, bensulide, metribuzin, postemergence, ha, yr, sequentialHerbicides for weed control
1290.05traffic, fraise, trafficked, wear, playability, recovery, hardness, fields, surface, surface hardnessTraffic tolerance and recovery
1380.04drought, drought performance, bulk, tolerance, root, tc, dalz 1606, 1606, traits, drought toleranceDrought stress physiology
1480.04isolates, clarireedia, genes, dollar, dollar spot, sdhi, spot, qoi, insensitivity, mutationsFungal pathogen genetics
1580.04formulation, ems, granular, formulations, el, callus, ppo, quinclorac, flumioxazin, kyllingaHerbicide formulations and adjuvants
1670.04lawn, vr, runoff, landscape, urban, landscapes, greenspaces, tree, shade tree, glyphosateUrban turfgrass landscapes
1770.04ice, ice encasement, encasement, carbohydrate, stress, anaerobic, physiological, freeze tolerance, antioxidant, toleranceCold tolerance and winter stress
1840.02mowing, autonomous, robotic, robotic mowing, mower, mowers, centipedegrass, conventional, rotary, mowing frequencyAutonomous mowing technology

Topic confidence

The model assigned 94% of abstracts to a specific topic, and 81% of those were assigned with high confidence (probability > 0.5). The low confidence areas make sense when you read through them, for example:

  • Seed germination and establishment (topic #7): Combines seed dormancy physiology with field establishment protocols
  • Herbicide formulations and adjuvants (topic #15): All about plant responses to chemicals, but mixes herbicide adjuvants and formulations with mutagenesis breeding (EMS mutagenesis uses a chemical mutagen)

Language models cluster text by shared vocabulary. This is apparent in these low-confidence topic assignments. The abstracts share enough terminology that the model groups them together, but the model’s uncertainty is informative. It takes domain expertise to troubleshoot these results.

The model initially generated 29 topics. I merged similar ones to get the 18 shown above. Starting with a few too many topics and consolidating them is faster than trying to split broad clusters.

Heatmap visualization

The heatmap below shows how similar topics are to each other. Darker colors indicate stronger similarity between topics. On desktop, hover over any square to see the similarity score.

Similarities highlight where researchers are using shared methods or talking about overlapping constraints. For example, mowing and species selection is similar to autonomous mowing technology, and herbicides for weed control is similar to disease management and fungicides. On the other hand, turfgrass genomics and breeding is not at all similar to traffic tolerance and recovery.

Topic similarity heatmap showing relationships between research themes

Comparison to 2024

Here’s how 2025 compares to last year:

  • Soil stuff jumped from #4 to #1. Soil topics made up the largest cluster of research focusing on amendments, soil testing philosophies and ROI, and nutrient leaching prevention. Carbon sequestration, which was its own small topic last year, merged into general soil management this year.
  • Remote sensing work continues to dominate. Last year remote sensing was the #1 topic. This year it was so big the topic modeling actually separated remote sensing work into two smaller subtopics: remote sensing of soil moisture and precision weed detection.
  • Dollar spot research increased with work in multiple topic clusters, including resistance and population genetics. Consistent work on applied management of dollar spot continues.
  • Autonomous mowing tech emerged as its own research cluster this year. The tech has matured into deployment and optimization phase. Researchers are thinking about “how do we do this better?”
  • Cold tolerance and winter stress formed its own cluster this year, reflecting WinterTurf project momentum.
  • Zoysiagrass breeding is particularly active. Last year included genetics work, but this year’s conference added high-end genomics. Zoysia appeared in multiple topic clusters and is proving importance as a low-input warm-season grass with exceptional stress tolerance.
  • The topic modeling improved. This year I was able to classify 81% of abstracts with high confidence, compared to 70% last year. This means 2025 abstracts formed more distinct and separated clusters. Could be either because the research topics themselves were more differentiated, my topic modeling better captured the structure in the data, or both.

Subscribe for blog updates